Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 28;9:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-62

Table 1.

New cases of diabetes and kappa agreement by clearance period and exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria for prevalent case

One hit method NDSS* method
Clearance period (years) Number of new cases Incidence proportion** Kappa agreement*** Number of new cases Incidence proportion** Kappa agreement***

1 91872 2.9% 0.427
(0.420-0.432)†,§
91872 2.9% 0.482
(0.479-0.485)†,§

2 52508 1.7% 0.739
(0.731-0.742)†,§
52508 1.7% 0.810
(0.801-0.822)†,§

3 43473 1.4% 0.849
(0.845-0.851)†,§
45525 1.5% 0.898
(0.896-0.900)†,§

4 39595 1.33% 0.900
(0.900-0905)†,§
42791 1.4% 0.936
(0.933-0.937)†,§

5 37473 1.23% 0.935
(0.933-0.937)†,§
41261 1.3% 0.957
(0.956-0.958)†,§

6 36111 1.16% 0.957
(0.955-0.958)†,§
40218 1.29% 0.971
(0.970-0.973)†,§

7 35094 1.14% 0.973
(0.972-0.974)†,§
39475 1.28% 0.982
(0.981-0.983)†,§

8 34400 1.11% 0.985
(0.983-0.986)†,§
38975 1.26% 0.990
(0.989-0.991)†,§

9 33932 1.09% 0.993
(0.992-0.994)†,§
38627 1.25% 0.996
(0.995-0.996)†,§

10 33498 1.08% 100 38342 1.24% 100

*: National Diabetes Surveillance System case definition in Canada.

**: Incidence proportion = (Number of incident cases of diabetes for the year 2002/population at risk of diabetes for the year 2002)*100; number of diabetes cases for the year 2002 using NDSS case definition criteria is 263,213; population of 20 years old or older for the year 2002 is 5,686,255;

***: Agreement between 10 years (expected) and observed clearance period according to the clearance period and exclusion criteria for prevalent case;

: 95%Confidence interval;

§: P < 0.0001, Chi-square test statistic for homogeneity.