Table 4.

Study results of survival of THAs and pelvic osteotomy

Study	Age (years)	Femoral type of THA/type of pelvic osteotomy	Overall survival for revision/conversion to THA after osteotomy
Mäkelä et al. [17]	55–64	Cementless, straight, porous-coated stem with a modular, porous-coated press-fit cup	95%/80% at 10/15 years
		Cementless, anatomic, porous-coated and/or hydroxyapatite-coated stem with a modular, porous-coated and/or hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cup	92%/78% at 10/15 years
		Hybrid	90% at 10 years
		Cemented	85%/71% at 10/15 years
Hartofilakidis et al. [7]	< 55	Cemented Charnley	90%/73% at 10/18 years
McAuley et al. [18]	< 50	Cementless, straight, porous-coated stem with a modular, porous-coated press-fit cup	89%/60% at 10/15 years
Allami et al. [1]	69.1 (21–103)	Cemented Charnley	95% at 10 years
Kerboull et al. [14]	< 50	Cemented Charnley-Kerboull	85.4% at 20 years
Yasunaga et al. [26]	< 46	Rotational acetabular osteotomy	93.7% at 10 years*
	46–58		70.0% at 10 years*
Peters et al. [21]	15–47	Bernese periacetabular osteotomy	92% at 36 months
Schramm et al. [22]	mean 24.4	Wagner spherical osteotomy	65.1% at 25 years
Current study	< 50	Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy	90.7% at 15 years
	50–60		82.6% at 15 years

* Radiographic progression of osteoarthritis was defined as the end point.