Table 3.

Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses testing sexual self schema as a moderator between global sexual satisfaction and quality of life outcomes (N = 175)

Step and predictor	Statistics by step		Statistics by predictor
	TR2	ΔR2	β	t
Outcome: CES-D (depressive symptoms); F(9, 159) = 22.55
1. Age	.103	.103**	−.127	−2.33*
Education			−.142	−2.57*
2. Vaginal changes	.500	.397**	.070	1.19
KPS			−.011	−.15
SymS/Toxicities			.060	.99
TDI			.513	7.13**
3. Global sexual satisfaction	.529	.029**	−.177	−3.04**
4. SSS	.549	.020**	−.154	−2.83**
5. Sexual satisfaction × SSS	.561	.012*	.116	2.08*
Outcome: SF-12 MCS (global QoL); F(7, 160) = 13.88
1. Age	.096	.096**	.265	4.14**
2. Vaginal changes	.326	.229**	−.104	−1.59
KPS			−.165	−2.00*
TDI			−.461	−5.46**
3. Global sexual satisfaction	.366	.040**	.222	3.26**
4. SSS	.368	.002	.056	.87
5. Sexual satisfaction × SSS	.378	.010	−.104	−1.59
Outcome: FACT (disease-specific QoL); F(8, 154) = 14.38
1. Vaginal changes	.366	.366**	−.163	−2.41*
KPS			.142	1.74
SymS/Toxicities			−.241	−3.43**
TDI			−.262	−3.17**
2. Partner sexual functioning	.370	.004	−.021	−.34
3. Global sexual satisfaction	.391	.022*	.111	1.64
4. SSS	.413	.022*	.143	2.27*
5. Sexual satisfaction × SSS	.428	.015*	.127	1.99*

^*p < .05

^**p < .01