Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 May 15;40(10):3168–3173. doi: 10.1021/es052426p

Table 2.

Nitrate and Total Phosphorus flux and concentration from the EISA.

River Reference Mean
Flowrate
(m3/s)
NO3
Flux
(MT/yr)
NO3
conc.
(mg/l)
Total P
Flux
(MT/yr)
Total P
conc. (mg/l)
Cedar R. at
Waterloo
This Studya 82.5 18,851 7.23 937 0.36
Goolsby et al.b 122.3 18,014 4.67 887 0.23
Cedar R. near
Conesville
This Studya 140.2 30,932 7.00 2,250 0.51
Libra et al.c - - 37,019 NR 1,461 NR
Cedar and Iowa
Combined at
Wapello
This Studya 281.5 59856 6.74 4397 0.50
Goolsby et al.b 288.9 44,573 4.99 2826 0.31
Iowa R. at
Columbus Jct.
This Studya 69.6 28,924 6.74 2,147 0.50
Libra et al.c - - 14,175 - - 565 - -
Skunk R. at
Augusta
This Studya 107.1 22,123 6.55 3,517 1.04
Goolsby et al.b 92.6 17,280 4.23 1,338 0.30
Libra et al.c - - 10,664 - - 540 - -
Wapsipinicon R.
at De Witt
This Studya 42.5 9,534 7.11 481 0.36
Libra et al.c - - 13,378 - - 460 - -
EISA TOTAL This Studya - - 91,513 - - 8,395 - -
Libra et al.c - - 75,236 - - 3,026 - -
a

This study includes data from 1996 through 2004.

b

Goolsby et al. includes data from 1980 through 1996. They report results for the Cedar River at Waterloo, the Cedar and Iowa Rivers combined and the Skunk River. They do not report results for the Wapsipinicon River.

c

Libra et al. include data from 1999 through 2001. They do not report nutrient concentrations