TABLE 4.
Model | k | N = 1000 | N = 50 | N = 10 | N = 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | Simulation | 4 | 0.0019 | 0.0041 | 0.0060 | 0.0045 |
2 | 0.0019 | 0.0041 | 0.0059 | 0.0039 | ||
1 | 0.0018 | 0.0041 | 0.0059 | 0.0036 | ||
Diffusion | 1 | 0.0018 | 0.0036 | 0.0058 | 0.0029 | |
Shortcut | 1 | 0.0019 | 0.0035 | 0.0045 | 0.0021 | |
II | Simulation | 4 | 0.0024 | 0.0049 | 0.0067 | 0.0048 |
2 | 0.0024 | 0.0045 | 0.0058 | 0.0038 | ||
1 | 0.0024 | 0.0045 | 0.0056 | 0.0035 | ||
Diffusion | 1 | 0.0023 | 0.0040 | 0.0050 | 0.0025 | |
Shortcut | 1 | 0.0024 | 0.0039 | 0.0043 | 0.0020 | |
III | Simulation | 4 | 0.0079 | 0.0129 | 0.0128 | 0.0066 |
2 | 0.0079 | 0.0122 | 0.0115 | 0.0048 | ||
1 | 0.0080 | 0.0119 | 0.0109 | 0.0044 | ||
Diffusion | 1 | 0.0076 | 0.0103 | 0.0099 | 0.0034 | |
Shortcut | 1 | 0.0080 | 0.0100 | 0.0085 | 0.0023 |
Values of the MSD additive variance obtained by simulation in the base population (N = 1000) or after 100 bottlenecks (N = 2, 10, 50, estimated from samples of 100 offspring in each line), for the different models and types of gene action (k = 1, no epistasis; k = 2, moderate synergistic epistasis; k = 4, strong synergistic epistasis), and MSD expectations (k = 1) derived from diffusion theory or a shortcut method (García-Dorado 2007) are shown.