Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2009 Jan 8;52(1):62–73. doi: 10.1021/jm800817h

Table 1.

Binding Affinities (Ki (nM)) of Candidate NET Ligands in in vitro Competition Assays with Human Monoamine Transportersa and Lipophilicities (log P7.4)

compound Ki for NETb Ki for SERTc Ki for DATd NET selectivity log P7.4
SERT/NET DAT/NET
MENET, 1 1.02 ± 0.11 93 ± 20 327 ± 39 92 321 2.04
FENET, 2 3.14 ± 0.17 430 ± 14 >6000 137 >2000 2.00
FPNET, 3 3.68 ± 0.92 463 ± 24 >6000 126 >2000 2.29
MESNET, 4 0.30 ± 0.03 14.80 ± 2.83 275 ± 83 49 917 2.47
(S,S)-reboxetine 1.04 ± 0.16 661 ± 36 >2000 636 >2000
(S,S)-MeNER 0.95 ± 0.03 185 ± 3 >2000 195 >2000
a

All Ki values are reported as nanomolar (nM) values. The data are expressed as geometric mean ± standard deviation of at least three separate experiments performed in triplicate.

b

Competitive binding vs [3H]nisoxetine in HEK-293 cells transfected with human norepinephrine transporters.

c

Competitive binding vs [3H]citalopram in HEK-293 cells transfected with human serotonin transporters.

d

Competitive binding vs [125I]RTI-55 in canine kidney cells transfected with human dopamie transporters.