Table 2. Pre- treatment and post treatment performance on the WAB (Kertesz, 1982), BNT (Goodglass et al., 1983), PALPA (Kay et al., 1992) and PAPT (Howard & Patterson, 1992). Changes exceeding 10% are highlighted in bold.

	P1		P2		P3
	Pre	Post	Pre	Post	Pre	Post
Western Aphasia Battery
I Spontaneous Speech	15	18	17	19	18	20
II. Auditory Verbal Comprehension	8.1	8.65	9	10	9.15	9.45
III. Repetition	9.8	9.8	7.8	7.9	8.2	6.2
IV. Naming	8.3	7.9	8.3	7.3	8.3	8.9
Aphasia Quotient	82.5	88.6	84.3	88.4	87.3	89.1
Boston Naming Test (%)	81	80.0	26.7	56.7	55.0	71.0
Psycholinguistic Assessment of Language Processing in Aphasia
Letter Length Reading (%)	70.8	95.8	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0
Spoken Word-Picture Matching (%)	97	92.5	95.0	100.0	97.5	97.5
Written Word-Picture Matching (%)	82.5	92.5	95.0	95.0	100.0	100.0
Auditory Synonym Judgments (%)	83.5	78.3	66.7	93.3	81.7	73.3
Written Synonym Judgments (%)	81.6	85.0	81.7	85.0	81.7	85.0
Spoken Picture Naming (%)	97.5	87.5	82.5	92.5	90.0	95.0
Writing Picture Naming (%)	67.5	75.0	90.0	95.0	95.0	97.5
Reading Picture Naming (%)	97.5	100.0	97.5	97.5	97.5	97.5
Repeating Picture Naming (%)	87.5	100.0	82.5	90.0	97.5	97.5
Pyramids and Palm Trees
3 pictures (%)	94.2	98.1	94.2	94.2	92.3	92.3
3 words (%)	80.2	96.2	88.5	94.2	88.5	92.3