Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2009 May 12;16(9):1056–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.023

Table 3.

Communication Content According to Level of Communication of Abnormal Diagnostic Exams and Confidence in Use of Statistics

Total
N
N and % who
are Confident in
use of Statistics
N and % who
are Frequent
Communicator
s of Abnormal
Diagnostic
Exams*
N and % who are Frequent
Communicators of Abnormal
Diagnostic Exams*
Among
those Not
Confident in
use of
Statistics
Among those
Confident in
use of
Statistics
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
TOTAL 243 191 (78.6) 187 (77.0) 38 (73.1) 149 (78.0)
When Discussing Positive mammography
exams with a patient would you use:
Numbers and statistics such as “your chances
of having cancer is less than 2%”
 Never 50 38 (76.0) 30 (60.0) 8 (66.7) 22 (57.9)
 Rarely/Sometimes 118 88 (74.6) 96 (81.4) 23 (76.7) 73 (83.0)
 Often/Always 67 60 (89.6) 59 (88.1) 6 (85.7) 53 (88.3)
General statements such as “your chance of
having cancer is extremely low”, N (%)
 Never 10 9 (90.0) 2 (20.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (22.2)
 Rarely/Sometimes 91 74 (81.3) 72 (79.1) 12 (70.6) 60 (81.1)
 Often/Always 138 105 (76.1) 112 (81.2) 26 (78.8) 86 (81.9)

Missing Data: Using numbers and statistics, such as “your chance of having cancer is less than 2%” is missing 8 responses. Using general statements such as, “your chance of having cancer is extremely low” is missing 4 responses.

Bold indicates a statistically significant difference(p-value<0.05) between the responses in a given category and all other categories