Table 2.
Treatment
|
Difference of least square means (95% CI)* | P value† | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypericum (n=157) | Imipramine (n=167) | ||||
Primary variable | |||||
Hamilton depression rating scale:‡ | |||||
Change from baseline score | 12.00 | 12.75 | −0.75 (−1.90 to 0.40) | 0.20 | |
Change from baseline score (analysis of data from patients who complied with protocol) | 11.53 | 11.21 | 0.32 (−0.72 to 1.36) | 0.55 | |
Secondary variables | |||||
Hamilton depression scale: | |||||
Score on anxiety-somatisation subscale | 3.79 | 4.26 | −0.48 (−0.91 to −0.04) | 0.03 | |
Score on depression subscale | 4.33 | 4.57 | −0.24 (−0.74 to 0.26) | 0.35 | |
Score on clinical global impression scale‡ | 2.22 | 2.42 | −0.20 (−0.42 to 0.02) | 0.08 | |
Score on patient's global impression scale‡ | 2.44 | 2.60 | −0.16 (−0.40 to 0.09) | 0.20 | |
Score of patient's assessment of tolerability | 1.67 | 2.35 | −0.68 (−0.88 to −0.49) | 0.00 |
Least square means are derived from the general linear model (analysis of covariance). The means are adjusted (end points reflect changes corrected for baseline values).
P values are exploratory; they are derived from the statistical analyses conducted to construct confidence intervals.
Lower scores indicate greater improvement.