Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 1;102(3):1606–1622. doi: 10.1152/jn.00167.2009

TABLE 2.

Correlation between neural latency and best (center) frequency

Monkey Field r P n
L A1 −0.410 0.007 42
S A1 −0.467 <10−4 74
L R −0.229 0.33 20
S R −0.314 0.014 61
L MM −0.743 <10−13 72
S MM −0.708 <10−4 30
L RM −0.623 0.0033 20
S RM −0.364 0.0518 29
Both pooled All pooled −0.562 <10−29 348

r, Pearson correlation coefficient between log neural response latency and log best (center) frequency (calculated for the stimulus bandwidth that provided the latency estimate; see methods); P, significance of the correlation; n, number of units. Units for which latency was estimated based on pink or white noise were excluded.