TABLE 2.
Monkey | Field | r | P | n |
---|---|---|---|---|
L | A1 | −0.410 | 0.007 | 42 |
S | A1 | −0.467 | <10−4 | 74 |
L | R | −0.229 | 0.33 | 20 |
S | R | −0.314 | 0.014 | 61 |
L | MM | −0.743 | <10−13 | 72 |
S | MM | −0.708 | <10−4 | 30 |
L | RM | −0.623 | 0.0033 | 20 |
S | RM | −0.364 | 0.0518 | 29 |
Both pooled | All pooled | −0.562 | <10−29 | 348 |
r, Pearson correlation coefficient between log neural response latency and log best (center) frequency (calculated for the stimulus bandwidth that provided the latency estimate; see methods); P, significance of the correlation; n, number of units. Units for which latency was estimated based on pink or white noise were excluded.