Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):375–391. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.375

Table 8.

Regression Analyses of Reading Times in Experiment 1 As a Function of Frequency, Plausibility, Predictability, Ambiguity, and transitivity

Reading Span
High
Medium
Low
Region β t β t β t
Prepositional Phrase
    Base frequency −.01 −0.14 .04 0.48 −.08 −0.82
    Past-participle frequency .04 0.52 −.08 −0.67 −.04 −0.39
    Past-tense frequency −.01 −0.11 −.15 −1.34 −.16 −1.42
    Ambiguity .20 2.92** .34 3.19** .17 1.72
    RC continuation −.24 −3.06** −.19 −1.72 .03 0.28
    Theme plausibility −.54 −7.82** .05 0.49 −.01 −0.05
    Agent plausibility .34 4.20** .17 1.75 −.02 −0.15
    Transitivity .01 0.13 .07 0.85 −.00 −0.00
Sentence Final
    Base frequency .06 0.77 −.00 −0.01 −.02 −0.27
    Past-participle frequency .09 0.86 .15 1.42 .12 1.15
    Past-tense frequency .05 0.53 .12 1.11 .09 0.82
    Ambiguity .07 0.83 .36 4.04** .37 4.08**
    RC continuation −.18 −1.86 −.19 −1.84 −.22 −2.14*
    Theme plausibility −.43 −4.95** −.15 −1.43 −.04 −0.46
    Agent plausibility .17 1.66 −.00 −0.04 .14 1.37
    Transitivity −.02 −0.12 −.05 −0.52 −.00 −0.01

Note—RC, relative clause.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.