Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Ecol. 2009 Apr;18(7):1341–1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04120.x

Table 3.

Loci more heterozygous than expected from simulation data and loci with significantly lower FST than expected. * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001. Significance levels are after Bonferroni correction.

Locus Chromosome Position Heterozygosity excess low FST
FH2309 CFA01 85.77 ***a,c not tested
C02.342 CFA02 21.05 ***b,c not tested
REN195B08 CFA04 60.34 **
FH5126 CFA04 65.25 *
FH2097 CFA04 71.9 *
FH3702 CFA05 32.91 **
REN204K13 CFA08 15.83 *
REN287G01 CFA09 63.03 *
FH4031 CFA11 18.2 **b not tested
FH5153 CFA13 65.38 *
FH5161 CFA17 21.25 *
REN52K18 CFA18 18.68 *
REN213G21 CFA19 45.8 *
REN124F16 CFA20 21.93 ***c **
FH5166 CFA20 50.52 *
REN114M19 CFA20 56.66 *
FH3287 CFA24 44.5 **
DGN10 CFA26 26.05 *
FH4001 CFA27 9.86 *
REN146G17 CFA28 33.55 *
CPH2 CFA32 9.65 *
REN243O23 CFA34 26.76 *
FH3865 CFA36 23.29 **
FH2998 CFA36 28.08 *
a

Also significant with an additional allele contributed by first founder male

b

No extra allele could have been contributed by first founder male as he had already contributed with two alleles in the dataset.

c

Also significant with an additional allele contributed by second founder male