Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009 Aug;66(8):567–587. doi: 10.1002/cm.20367

Table 2.

Comparison of the effects of extracellular CaCl2, KCl and a spatial gradient of cAMP on behavior, cell morphology and myosin II localization.

Parametersa 0 mM CaCl2
(no cAMP)
0 mM CaCl2
(cAMP grad.)b
10 mM CaCl2
(no cAMP)
10 mM CaCl2
(cAMP grad.)b
40 mM K+Cl2
(no cAMP)
Inst. Velocity 6μm/min 7μm/min 14μm/min 14μm/min 9μm/min
Proportion ≥ 9μm/min 10% 15% 65% 92% 45%
Persistence 0.25 0.45 0.40 0.80 0.60
Dir. change 45 deg/4sec 35 deg/4sec 30 deg/4 sec 20 deg/4 sec 30 deg/4 sec
Uropod no no yes yes yes
Rel. cort. myo II. ant. 70 165 100 120 160
Rel. cort. myo II. post. 70 175 150 200 190
Ratio cort. myo II (post/ant) 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.3
Ant. ps. form. 4/10 min 1/10 min 4/10 min 0.2/10 min n.p.
Post. ps. form. 4/10 min 3/10 min 1/10 min 0.2/10 min n.p.
Chem. index n.a. +0.3 n.a. +0.8 +0.7
% pos chem. n.a. 80% n.a. 95% 90%
a

Inst. velocity, instantaneous velocity; Dir. change, directional change; Rel. cort. myo II. ant. or post., relative cortical myosin II anterior or posterior, respectively; Ant. ps. form., anterior pseudopod formation; Post. ps. form., posterior pseudopod formation; Chem. index, chemotactic index; % pos. chem.., percent positive chemotaxis. Average values of parameters have been rounded off.

b

cAMP grad., cAMP gradient.

c

n.a., not available.

d

n.p., not performed.