Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 26;106(37):15588–15593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813370106

Table 1.

Observed and simulated mean accuracy by task, condition, and memory strength

Retrieval type Recall No-think Press-enter Baseline
Strong Memory Strength
    Original cue recall 0.96 (0.02) 0.96 0.83 (0.02) 0.81 0.82 (0.02) 0.81 0.86 (0.02) 0.87
    Independent cue recall 0.49 (0.02) 0.54 0.48 (0.02) 0.48 0.45 (0.02) 0.48 0.50 (0.02) 0.51
    Forced-choice recognition 0.96 (0.01) 0.96 0.95 (0.01) 0.95 0.96 (0.01) 0.95 0.94 (0.01) 0.95
Weak memory strength
    Original cue recall 0.95 (0.02) 0.95 0.60 (0.02) 0.65 0.62 (0.02) 0.65 0.73 (0.02) 0.73
    Independent cue recall 0.50 (0.02) 0.54 0.44 (0.02) 0.41 0.49 (0.02) 0.41 0.54 (0.02) 0.47
    Forced-choice recognition 0.96 (0.01) 0.96 0.92 (0.01) 0.92 0.93 (0.01) 0.92 0.94 (0.01) 0.92

The first value is observed accuracy. Observed SEM is given in parentheses. The last value is predicted accuracy.