Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug 17;91(6):1050–1062. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602103

Table 5. Methodological quality of included trials (n=13).

  No. of trials (%)
Quality indicator Yes, fulfilled No Unclear
Method of randomisation 13 (100%)
Adequate concealment of allocation 5 (38%) 8 (62%)
       
Groups similar at baseline:
Gender 10 (77%) 3 (23%)
Age 6 (46%) 3 (23%) 4 (31%)
Functional status 6 (46%) 1 (8%) 6 (46%)
Emotional distress 8 (62%) 1 (8%) 4 (31%)
Key outcome measures 9 (69%) 1 (8%) 3 (23%)
       
Cointerventions:      
Cointerventions avoided by trial design 3 (23%) 10 (77%)
Cointerventions monitored 4 (31%) 9 (69%)
       
Compliance monitored and acceptable 6 (46%) 7 (54%)
       
Blinded outcome assessment for at least one key outcome 13 (100%)
       
Relevant outcome measures 13 (100%)
       
Withdrawal/dropout rate:
N and reasons described 7 (54%) 6 (46%)
% lost ⩽20% or comparable between groups 4 (31%) 2 (15%) 7 (54%)
       
Comparable timing of outcome assessment in both groups 13 (100%)
       
Intention-to-treat analyses explicitly stated 4 (31%) 3 (23%) 6 (46%)