Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 15;83(19):9743–9758. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00125-09

TABLE 1.

Thymic cell surface marker analysis in HIVNef Tg micea

Mouse lineb Mean no. of cells (10−6) ± SD in different subpopulations
CD4/CD8 Mean fluorescence (%) ± SDc
Total CD4+ CD8+ CD4+ CD8 CD4 CD8+ Mean TcR count ± SD CD4 CD8 SpCD4
Non-Tg 120 ± 37 99 ± 31 10.5 ± 3.4 2.3 ± 0.6 13.8 ± 5.1 4.0 ± 0.8 100 100 100
CD4C/HIVNef 65 ± 18* 55 ± 15* 2.9 ± 1.1* 2.6 ± 0.6* 5.4 ± 1.6* 1.1 ± 0.2* 37 ± 2.8* 53 ± 9.4* 20 ± 4.5*
mCD4/HIVNef
    F85838 56 ± 26* 44 ± 21* 4.6 ± 2.4* 1.7 ± 0.8* 5.6 ± 3* 2.6 ± 0.9 46 ± 10* 52 ± 4* 25 ± 9*
    F85840 92 ± 49 74 ± 42 5.4 ± 2* 3.4 ± 1.1 1.6 ± 0.5* 7.0 ± 3* 45 ± 7* 51 ± 7* 37 ± 13*
CD4F/HIVNef
    F78558 84 ± 36 68 ± 27 4.7 ± 2.3* 4.4 ± 2.0 5.6 ± 2.6* 1.0 ± 0.1* 36 ± 3.1* 57 ± 4.5* 32 ± 10*
    F95136 45 ± 23* 39 ± 20* 1.7 ± 0.9* 1.6 ± 1* 3.0 ± 1.7* 1.1 ± 0.1* 10 ± 0.6* 64 ± 1.3* 31 ± 2*
CD4E/HIVNef
    F104990 30 ± 6.2* 25 ± 5.0* 1.2 ± 0.2* 1.1 ± 0.2* 2.2 ± 0.4* 1.1 ± 0.1* 38 ± 2* 55 ± 0.7* 53 ± 13*
    F104991 43 ± 9.6* 31 ± 7.8* 4.2 ± 1.4* 2 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.9* 2.2 ± 0.5* 47 ± 21* 70 ± 8* 60 ± 6.1*
CD68/HIVNef
    F115706 114.9 ± 21.7 95.0 ± 17.8 9.3 ± 1.2 2.7 ± 0.5 17.0 ± 2.9 4.9 ± 1.6 93.7 ± 10.5 94.4 ± 9.4 100
    F115708 86.5 ± 9.5 70.9 ± 13 7.8 ± 1.5 3.2 ± 1.3 13.6 ± 5.8 2.6 ± 0.6 78 ± 12 82 ± 3 100
    F115709 82.5 ± 30.2 68.4 ± 25.5 6.7 ± 2.3 2.6 ± 1.1 12.6 ± 5.3 2.6 ± 0.6 84.1 ± 11.8 99.9 ± 18.4 100
CD11c/HIVNef
    F98501 88.3 ± 23.0 75.3 ± 21.4 6.1 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.4 11.2 ± 2.4 3.0 ± 0.3 99.9 ± 5.9 96.7 ± 5.8 99.9 ± 18.4
    F98506 91.4 ± 15 73 ± 13 12.4 ± 3.1 2.0 ± 0.4 14.4 ± 3.4 5.9 ± 0.9 96 ± 4 92 ± 2.7 100
    F98507 107 ± 27.1 84.6 ± 19.2 12 ± 3.8 3.5 ± 2 14 ± 4.8 4.0 ± 1.2 100 100 100
a

*, P < 0.05 according to the Student t test, comparing Tg with non-Tg groups. TcR, T-cell receptor.

b

FACS analysis was performed on four to nine mice (1.5 to 3 months old) for each Tg line, including the positive control CD4C/HIVNef Tg mice, except for CD11c/HIVNef and CD68/HIVNef mice (both founders), which were analyzed at 2 to 4 months of age. The non-Tg control values were obtained by pooling the results of all non-Tg littermates from different lines.

c

The mean fluorescence values for CD4 and CD8 in DP CD4+ CD8+ and CD4 in SP T cells were obtained by calculating the ratio of CD4 or CD8 staining in Tg thymuses relative to those of non-Tg thymuses (100%). Mean values were then calculated with the values for each line.