Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 26;10:400. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-400

Table 3.

Comparison of methods

Contigsa Singletons Mate Splits Contigs Splita Contigs Merged Timeb
PAVE 5601c 0 0 186 0 3 h 25 m
TGICL 8888 71 16583 3401 12 25 m
CAP3 8811 342 16621 3454 15 2 h 12 m

a Does not include singletons.

b PAVE and TGICL used 4 processors, whereas CAP3 is not parallelized so used one processor.

c 3514 contigs are joined by n's where 53 of them are single-mate pair contigs.