Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Artif Intell Res. 2008 Jul 1;32(2):663–704.

Table 4.

Comparison of different search heuristics on different instances of the FieldVision-RockSample environment.

Heuristic Return EBR (%) LBI Belief Nodes Nodes Reused (%) Online Time (ms)
FVRS[5,5] [Blind: Return:8.15, |Γ| = 1, Time=170ms]
RTBSS(2) 16.54 ± 0.37 18.4 ± 1.1 2.80 ± 0.19 18499 ± 102 0 ± 0 3135 ± 27
AEMS1 16.88 ± 0.36 17.1 ± 1.1 2.35 ± 0.16 8053 ± 123 1.19 ± 0.07 876 ± 5
Satia and Lave 18.68 ± 0.39 15.9 ± 1.2 2.17 ± 0.16 7965 ± 118 0.88 ± 0.06 878 ± 4
HSVI-BFS 20.27 ± 0.44 23.8 ± 1.4 2.64 ± 0.14 4494 ± 105 4.50 ± 0.80 857 ± 12
AEMS2 21.18 ± 0.45 31.5 ± 1.5 3.11 ± 0.15 12301 ± 440 3.93 ± 0.22 854 ± 13
BI-POMDP 22.75 ± 0.47 31.1 ± 1.2 3.30 ± 0.17 12199 ± 427 2.26 ± 0.44 782 ± 12
FVRS[5,7] [Blind: Return:8.15, |Γ| = 1, Time=761ms]
RTBSS(1) 20.57 ± 0.23 7.72 ± 0.13 2.07 ± 0.11 516 ± 1 0 ± 0 254 ± 1
BI-POMDP 22.75 ± 0.25 11.1 ± 0.4 2.08 ± 0.07 4457 ± 61 0.37 ± 0.11 923 ± 2
Satia and Lave 22.79 ± 0.25 11.1 ± 0.4 2.05 ± 0.08 3683 ± 52 0.36 ± 0.07 947 ± 3
AEMS1 23.31 ± 0.25 12.4 ± 0.4 2.24 ± 0.08 3856 ± 55 1.36 ± 0.13 942 ± 3
AEMS2 23.39 ± 0.25 13.3 ± 0.4 2.35 ± 0.08 4070 ± 58 1.64 ± 0.14 944 ± 2
HSVI-BFS 23.40 ± 0.25 13.0 ± 0.4 2.30 ± 0.08 3573 ± 52 1.69 ± 0.27 946 ± 3