Skip to main content
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior logoLink to The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
. 1993;11:9–18. doi: 10.1007/BF03392883

Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children

James W Partington, Jon S Bailey
PMCID: PMC2748553  PMID: 22477076

Abstract

Four preschool children who were taught to tact a set of Peabody picture cards were unable to emit those same responses under intraverbal conditions. A transfer of stimulus control procedure was used to bring the responses under intraverbal control. A multiple probe design was used to demonstrate experimental control. The results indicate that the transfer procedure was effective in developing the responses as intraverbals, and in increasing the subjects' scores on the Verbal Fluency subtest of the McCarthy Scales. A second study demonstrated that teaching four additional subjects to tact both the items and the class of which the items were members resulted in the untrained emergence of a few intraverbal responses for two of four subjects. For the other subjects and classes, it was still necessary to teach each of the responses as intraverbals, further demonstrating that tacts and intraverbals are separate verbal operants. The implications of these results for the use of Skinner's (1957) analysis of verbal behavior for studying typical language development are discussed.

Full text

PDF
12

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braam S. J., Poling A. Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: classification of verbal responses. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1983;4(4):279–302. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(83)90030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Horner R. D., Baer D. M. Multiple-probe technique: a variation on the multiple baseline. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):189–196. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lamarre J., Holland J. G. The functional independence of mands and tacts. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):5–19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Luciano M. C. Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1986;7(1):1–20. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(86)90014-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sigafoos J., Reichle J., Doss S., Hall K., Pettitt L. "Spontaneous" transfer of stimulus control from tact to mand contingencies. Res Dev Disabil. 1990;11(2):165–176. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(90)90033-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Analysis of verbal behavior are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES