Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):142–156. doi: 10.1037/a0014414

Table 2. Neuropsychological Studies of Binge Drinking.

Sample size

Study (year) Study characteristics F M Tasks Outcomea (C = Control, B = Binge)
Kokavec & Crowe (1999) Binge: Consume >10 drinks irregularly (<2 days per week) 12 38 WMS-R Logical Memory C > B
Nonbinge: Consume >10 alcoholic drinks/day 6 44 WMS-R Visual Reproduction C = B
Conditions: All subjects diagnosed alcohol dependent, detoxified, gender/family history matched, subjects abstained from alcohol >2 weeks prior, no smoking data on subjects Rey Complex Figure C = B
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Trail Making Test C = B
C = B
Weissenborn & Duka (2003) Binge: 0.8 g/kg of 90% volume/volume alcohol in 30 min 24 24 CANTAB–Tower of London C > B
CANTAB–Spatial Recognition Task C > B
Nonbinge: placebo group 25 22 CANTAB–Spatial Working Memory Task C = B
Conditions: Alcohol challenge, no alcohol abuse, subjects abstained from alcohol for >12 hr prior, smoking data unreported, gender taken into account CANTAB–Pattern Recognition Task C = B
Verster et al. (2003) Binge: Moderate alcohol drinkers 8–9 standard drinks (1.4 g/kg body weight) in 30 min Not reported Word Learning Test–Learning C > B
Word Learning Test–Delayed Recall C > B
Nonbinge: Moderate alcohol drinkers in placebo Word Learning Test–Immediate Recall C = B
Word Learning Test–Recognition Score C = B
Conditions: Alcohol challenge, no alcohol dependency, gender taken into account, <10 cigarettes per day allowed, no alcohol recency data Word Learning Test–Recognition Time C = B
Mackworth Clock Test C = B
Hartley et al. (2004) Binge: Binge Drinking Score > cutoff, 10 units (8 g alcohol) per occasion, ≥5 M (≥4 F) per occasion 5 9 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale C > B
Line Drawing Recall Test C > B
Nonbinge: Nondrinkers 7 6 Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test C > B
Conditions: Some alcohol dependent subjects included, gender taken into account, alcohol intake in past week measured, only minimal smoking in subjects (<5 per day) CANTAB–Stockings of Cambridge Test C > B
CANTAB–IDED Test C = B
Bond and Lader Mood Rating Scale C = B
Spatial Working Memory Test C = B
Spatial Recognition Memory Test C = B
Pattern Recognition Memory Test C = B
Word List Recall Test C = B
Townshend & Duka (2005) Binge: Binge Drinking Score > cutoff 15 23 CANTAB–Matching-to-Sample Visual C > B
Nonbinge: Binge Drinking Score < cutoff 21 13 Search task: Choice Time (bingers shorter some conditions)
Conditions: No subjects with alcohol dependence, gender taken into account, subjects abstained from alcohol for >12 hr prior, smoking not controlled CANTAB–Matching to Sample Visual C > B
Search task: Movement Time (binger shorter)
CANTAB-Spatial Working Memory task (F > M errors than nonbinger group) C > B
CANTAB-Matching to Sample Visual Search task: Errors Made C = B
Gordon Diagnostic System-Vigilance task C = B
Goudriaan et al. (2007) Binge: ≥5 drinks on one occasion, ≥2 times past 30 days Not reported Iowa Gambling Task–Effects of Punishment Frequency C > B (heavy bingers only)
Nonbinge: ≥5 drinks on one occasion, <2 times past 30 days
Conditions: Groups matched on age, gender, ethnicity, smoking

Note. C = B: No significant difference between control and binge group. F = female; M = male; WMS-R = Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; CANTAB = Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery; IDED = Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift.

a

C > B: Controls scored significantly higher than binge group.