TABLE 7.

Within Ethnicity: Monitoring, Warmth, Communication, Behavioral Control^a

	Monitoring Grade 8		Monitoring Grade 9		Monitoring Grade 10		Warmth Grade 8		Communication Grade 8		Communication Grade 9		Behavior Control Grade 8
Parameter	B	S.E.	3	S.E.	B	S.E.	B	S.E.	B	S.E.	B	S.E.	B	S.E.
TERS—coping with antagonism	0.10	.17	0.22+	.16	0.12	.16	0.03	.14	0.06	.13	0.17	.14	0.01	.13
TERS—cultural appreciation of legacy	0.14	.17	0.03	.18	0.12	.16	−0.15	.16	−0.08	.15	0.04	.15	0.03	.16
TERS—cultural alertness to discrimination	−0.37*	.16	−0.20+	.11	−0.20+	.12	0.08	.11	−0.23*	.10	−0.19+	.10	0.03	.22
TERS—cultural endorsement of mainstream	0.14	.12	0.00	.12	0.15	.14	0.08	.11	0.18+	.10	0.18	.13	−0.02	.10
Religiosity	0.03	.13	0.22*	.09	0.17	.11	0.12	.10	−0.05	.10	0.17+	.10	0.00	.11
Neighborhood	−0.04	.09	0.00	.09	−0.09	.09	0.01	.10	−0.10	.09	−0.11	.09	0.05	.09
SES	0.01		0.02	.12	−0.05	.08	−0.04	.11	0.00	.09	0.02	.08	−0.02	.10
Stress	−0.13		−0.04	.12	−0.01	.11	0.09	.12	−0.06	.11	0.01	.09	0.06	.10
Depression	−0.15		−0.13	.09	−0.08	.11	−0.12	.10	−0.32**	.11	−0.26**	.09	−0.03	.11
Site—Durham	−0.22		−0.11	.28	−0.45+	.25	−0.02	.23	−0.18	.22	0.05	.22	−0.40+	.24
Site—Nashville	−0.60+		−0.44	.35	−0.70*	.31	−0.65*	.27	−'0.50+	.27	−0.18	.27	−0.71*	.28
F	3.69**		3.04**		2.93**		3.69**		4.59**		3.60**		1.67
Degrees of freedom	156		156		156		156		156		156		156
R2	0.206		0.174		0.171		0.204		0.242		0.202		0.105
Adj. R2	0.150		0.116		0.112		0.148		0.189		0.146		0.042

^aTable contains results of step two in two-step regression analyses.

^*p > .05,

^**p < .01

Significant parameters arr bolded for ease of viewing.