Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 6;16(10):2771–2778. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0651-x

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

N = 122
Age (yr) 57.56 ±12.24
Sex
    Female 46 (37.7%)
    Male 76 (62.3%)
UICC 6th TNM stage
    Stage II 54 (44.3%)
    Stage III 68 (55.7%)
Preoperative mean CEA 28.73 (5.03–447.20)
POD 7 mean CEA (ng/ml) 6.77 (0.20–55.00)
POD 30 mean CEA (ng/ml) 3.34 (0.10–39.21)
Mean gradient (value “q”) 0.6050 (−0.0639–3.07)
R2 value 0.8778 (0.02–1.00)

CEA carcinoembryonic antigen; POD postoperative day

R2 value and gradient (value “q”) were calculated through trend line illustrating exponential decrease (Y = px−q). R2 values indicate the correlation coefficient between exponential graph and measured CEA values and the gradient (value “q”) is illustrative of the velocity of clearance. The greater values “q” tended to show more rapid decline