Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharm Sci. 2009 Sep;98(9):3218–3238. doi: 10.1002/jps.21768

Table 2.

Summary of theoretical adsorption footprint values and loading of a mAb monolayer adsorbed to a surface for different model scenarios. The models are organized from small to large footprint (high to low in loading). Models considered include: hexagonal close packing of discs (hcp); Random Sequential Adsorption (RSA) of discs and rectangles; and oriented close packing. Equation 2 was used to calculate the footprint values.

Adsorption Model θm Adsorbed Dimensions Footprint (m2/mg) Loading (mg/m2)
end-on, close 1 4.5 × 14 nm 0.26 3.8
hcp, disc 0.91 10.5 nm disc 0.40 2.5
end-on, RSA 0.56 4.5 × 14 nm 0.47 2.1
side-on, close 1 10 × 14 nm 0.58 1.7
RSA, disc 0.547 10.5 nm disc 0.66 1.5
side-on, RSA 0.56 10 × 14 nm 1.04 0.96