Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Educ Prev. 2009 Feb;21(1):25–38. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.1.25

Table 2.

Agreement Characteristics

Overall By Couple Serostatus

(N = 382) −/− (n = 176) −/+ (n = 90) +/+ (n = 116)

Agreement type § Monogamous 48 56 36 47
Open w/ Some Restrictions 42 42 44 40
Open w/ No Restrictions 9 2 18 13

Agreement factors Explicitness of Agreement (mean score) 12.5 13.0 a b 11.7 a 11.9 b
Length of Agreement (mean) 3yrs 9mos 3yrs 3mos 5yrs 9mos 3yrs 1mo
 Same-race relationships 3yrs 10mos 2yrs 10mos a 6yrs 3mos a b 3yrs 6mos b
 Mixed-race relationships 3yrs 8mos 3yrs 11mos 5yrs 2yrs 7mos
Agreement Quality (mean score) 83.1 86.3 a 78.6 a 81.6

No. of times broke agreement (past 12mos.) Never 68 69 66 66
Once 10 10 9 11
Twice or more 19 18 20 22
Don't Know 3 3 6 1

No. of times disclosed a broken agreement (past12mos.)@ No. who broke agreement (N = 115) (n = 50) (n = 27) (n = 38)
Never 50 55 48 45
Once 26 21 26 34
Twice or more 24 25 26 21

Note: All entries in the table are column percentages for the specific agreement characteristic unless otherwise noted. They do not add to 100 due to rounding errors. The means displayed in the table are unadjusted means.

§

Two participants in the `−/+' group reported having no agreement.

a b

All models controlled for length of relationship and the couple's race (same-race / mixed-race). The superscripts denote a difference in the adjusted means between groups that was statistically significant (P<05).

There was a significant interaction between the length of agreement and the couple's race. Only same-race couples showed significant differences in length of agreement between the couple-serostatus groups.

@

Of those who broke their agreement in the past 12 months.