. 2009 Apr 29;61(7-8):449–460. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9635-3

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses for confronting sexism.

	B	SE	Wald χ²	Odds ratio
Block 1: individual factors			12.43^**
Prior experiences with sexism	−.16	.21	.58	.85
Collective action	1.17	.68	2.95⁺	3.23
Feminist identification	−.72	.31	5.48^*	.49
Block 2: individual and situational factors			41.92^***
Prior experiences with sexism	−.14	.22	.37	.87
Collective action	1.37	.73	3.53⁺	3.92
Feminist identification	−.72	.32	5.00^*	.49
Familiar/Higher-status perpetrators	−.79	.34	5.58^*	.45
Unfamiliar perpetrators	−1.09	.35	9.79^**	.34
Unfair treatment	−.37	.37	1.03	.69
Unwanted sexual attention	−1.03	.36	8.44^**	.36

N = 273. Prior experiences with sexism: scale ranged from 1 (never in the past year) to 6 (almost every week). Collective action: Proportion of 25 activist behaviors reported. Feminist identification: 1 = no. 0 = yes, and ambivalent. Familiar/higher-status perpetrators: 1 = familiar/higher-status. 0 = familiar/equal-status. Unfamiliar perpetrators: 1 = unfamiliar. 0 = familiar/equal-status. Unfair Treatment: 1 = unfair treatment. 0 = sexist comments. Unwanted Sexual Attention: 1 = unwanted sexual attention. 0 = sexist comments

⁺p < .10

^*p < .05

^**p < .01

^***p < .001