Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 May 6;103(1-2):84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.019

Table 4.

Model summaries for stepwise regressions predicting cue elicited approach from self-report factor/subscale models.

Predictor Model Subscale/Factor(s) Retained R f F(df) β SE pr p <
Rationally-derived ACQ-Now subscales model 0.26 0.35 19.96 (2,111) 0.001
ACQ-Now subscale Lack Control 0.35 0.07 0.29 0.001
SMAST 0.22 0.17 0.19 0.05
Singleton et al. (1995) factor model 0.28 0.39 20.79 (2,109) 0.001
ACQ-Now factor Expectancy 0.34 0.08 0.34 0.001
SMAST 0.29 0.14 0.29 0.005
Love et al. (1998) factor model 0.25 0.33 18.52 (2,110) 0.001
Love No Desire To Drink 0.26 0.09 0.28 0.005
SMAST 0.39 0.13 0.40 0.001
Raabe et al. (2005) factor model 0.25 0.33 18.33 (2,110) 0.001
Raabe Urge and Intention to Drink 0.28 0.03 0.28 0.005
SMAST 0.30 0.15 0.29 0.005

Note: ACQ-Now subscale = Alcohol Craving Questionnaire-Now original subscales; ACQ-Now factor = Alcohol Craving Questionnaire-Now original factors; Love = ACQ-Now factors reported in Love et al., 1998; Raabe = ACQ-Now factors reported in Raabe et al., 2005;; SMAST = Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Suggested f2 effect size descriptions range across small (.02), med (.15), and large (.35).