Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2008 Nov 9;17(1):149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.008

Table 2.

CoMFA correlation statistics for carboxylesterase inhibition by benzil derivatives

Parameters used for analysesb Statistics for cross-validationa

hiCE (n = 31)c
hCE1 (n = 29)
rCE (n = 32)
log P log P2 vol vol2 q2 spress m Corr No.d q2 spress m Corr No. q2 spress m Corr No.
0.539 0.582 4 1 0.015 0.722 2 10 0.296 0.771 2 19
0.538 0.594 5 2 0.548 0.532 6 11 0.341 0.76 3 20
0.521 0.618 6 3 0.485 0.568 6 12 0.157 0.875 4 21
0.508 0.601 4 4 0.079 0.712 3 13 0.284 0.792 3 22
0.554 0.572 4 5 0.083 0.711 3 14 0.280 0.794 3 23
0.511 0.611 5 6 0.594 0.504 6 15 0.374 0.754 4 24
0.557 0.582 5 7 0.603 0.498 6 16 0.325 0.783 5 25
0.541 0.604 6 8 0.545 0.533 6 17 0.106 0.918 5 26
0.548 0.600 6 9 0.546 0.533 6 18 0.206 0.865 5 27
a

The statistical quality of the models is described in terms of: q = leave-one-out cross-validated correlation coefficient, spress = cross-validated standard error, m = number of components. The maximum component number (m) in the cross-validation test was set as 6 for all CoMFA analyses. Correlations 7, 16 and 24 were selected as the optimal equations for hiCE, hCE1 and rCE, respectively. The final statistics for these equations were: Corr 7, SE = 0.307, r2 = 0.876; Corr 16, SE = 0.176, r2 = 0.950; Corr 24 SE = 0.466, r2 = 0.760.

b

The parameters employed in the CoMFA analysis are indicated as included (○), or not included (—) in the generation of the final equation.

c

The number of compounds used in the CoMFA analysis based upon the activity data in Table 3.

d

Correlation number.