Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem. 2008 Nov 9;17(1):149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.008

Table 5.

CoMFA statistics for TFK-inhibitors in gem-diol conformationa

Enzyme q2 spress m r2 SE log P log P2 Corr No.
Data for 5 min Ki incubation
hiCEb 0.275 1.156 4 0.966 0.251 28a
0.767 0.586 1 0.845 0.478 29a
0.771 0.625 3 0.945 0.305 30a
hCE1c 0.474 0.709 3 0.922 0.273 31a
0.719 0.518 3 0.925 0.267 32a
0.732 0.506 3 0.939 0.241 33a
rCEd 0.563 0.611 4 0.960 0.184 34a
0.794 0.419 4 0.959 0.188 35a
0.787 0.427 4 0.957 0.191 36a
Data for 24 h Ki incubation
hiCE 0.120 1.026 4 0.979 0.160 28b
−0.091 1.143 4 0.962 0.215 29b
−0.075 1.135 4 0.957 0.227 30b
hCE1 0.442 0.423 3 0.921 0.159 31b
0.463 0.400 2 0.867 0.199 32b
0.503 0.416 4 0.934 0.152 33b
rCE 0.050 0.947 3 0.936 0.246 34b
−0.169 0.978 1 0.256 0.780 35b
−0.167 0.977 1 0.155 0.831 36b
a

The parameters employed in the CoMFA analysis are indicated as included (○), or not included (—) in the generation of the final equation. The statistical quality of the models is described in terms of: q = leave-one-out cross-validated correlation coefficient, spress = cross-validated standard error, m = number of components, r = conventional correlation coefficient, SE = conventional standard error.

b

Correlation 30a was selected as the best correlation and is shown as Eq. (10a) and displayed in Figure 3.

c

Correlation 33a was selected as the best correlation and is shown as Eq. (11a) and displayed in Figure 3.

d

Correlation 35a was selected as the best correlation and is shown as Eq. (12a) and displayed in Figure 3.