Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2009 Jun;65(2):521–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01109.x

Table 2.

Simulation results for adjusted association

θ0 = θ1 = 1:6 θ0 = 2; θ1 = 4


n Bias SE SEE 95% CI Bias SE SEE 95% CI
50 −0.02 0.39 0.37 0.93 −0.54 0.42 0.40 0.80
100 −0.01 0.28 0.26 0.94 −0.67 0.30 0.29 0.65
150 0.01 0.23 0.22 0.95 −0.89 0.24 0.24 0.51

noindent Note: θ0 and θ1 denote dependence parameters in Clayton-Oakes model for control and treatment groups, respectively. In situation where θ1 ≠ θ2, bias is calculated using the true theta value is 2. SE is the standard error of θ across simulation samples; SEE denotes average of standard errors based on empirical distribution of θ.