Table 4.
Hierarchical Linear Model Results for Burnout
| Predictor | Coefficient |
|---|---|
| Base Burnout rating | 23.83** |
| Program-level model | |
| Intensive | 1.57 |
| Mixed | 0.92 |
| CJ referrals (percentage) | −0.11 |
| Dual diagnosis (percentage) | −0.16 |
| Operates under parent organization | −0.66 |
| Counseling staff size (log) | 0.21 |
| Low caseload (percentage) | −0.07 |
| High caseload (percentage) | 0.07 |
| Director Leadership (average) | −0.33** |
| Outlier program | −8.10* |
| Missing on CJ referrals | 1.03 |
| Missing on dual diagnosis | −1.08 |
| Staff-level model | |
| Female | −0.25 |
| Ethnic minority | 0.87 |
| Graduate degree | −0.65 |
| Certified | −0.09 |
| Experience (3+ years) | 0.77 |
| Low caseload | 0.42 |
| High caseload | 2.50 |
| Program-level model for high caseload | |
| Intensive | 3.81 |
| Mixed | −0.33 |
| CJ referrals (percentage) | −0.94* |
| Dual diagnosis (percentage) | −0.47 |
| Operates under parent organization | −2.94 |
| Counseling staff size (log) | 0.90 |
| Low caseload (percentage) | −0.35 |
| High caseload (percentage) | −0.30 |
| Director Leadership (average) | −0.23 |
| Missing on CJ referrals | −22.88* |
| Missing on dual diagnosis | 9.19 |
| Missing on gender | 4.65* |
| Missing on minority status | 1.19 |
| Missing on degree | −4.86 |
| Missing on certification | −1.27 |
| Missing on experience | 0.76 |
| Missing on caseload | 5.99 |
*
p < .05;
**
p < .01