Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Mar 31;37(2):160–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.12.002

Table 5.

Hierarchical Linear Model Results for Job Satisfaction

Predictor Coefficient
Base Satisfaction rating 40.14**
Program-level model
     Intensive 1.70
     Mixed 1.77*
     CJ referrals (percentage) −0.04
     Dual diagnosis (percentage) 0.13
     Operates under parent organization 0.74
     Counseling staff size (log) −0.27
     Low caseload (percentage) −0.09
     High caseload (percentage) 0.21
     Director Leadership (average) 0.53**
     Outlier program 1.47
     Missing on CJ referrals −3.14
     Missing on dual diagnosis 3.27
Staff-level model
     Female 0.80
     Ethnic minority −0.96
     Graduate degree −0.23
     Certified 0.39
     Experience (3+ years) −0.49
     Low caseload 0.39
     High caseload −1.59*
     Missing on gender 1.81
     Missing on minority status −3.04
     Missing on degree −3.32
     Missing on certification 3.29*
     Missing on experience 0.24
     Missing on caseload −1.36
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01