Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Oecologia. 2009 Mar 5;160(2):343–352. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1305-1

Table 2.

Nested ANOVAs on abundance of A. aegypti and A. albopictus in standard green vases from Tampa, St. Petersburg, and Bradenton and black ovitraps from Tampa

A. aegypti
A. albopictus
df F P df F P
Standard green vases
 Tampa
  Season 1, 12.8 17.94 0.0010* 1, 11.7 13.65 0.0032*
  Site type 1, 12.5 1.01 0.3344 1, 11.6 1.95 0.1886
  Season × site type 1, 13.1 0.97 0.3432 1, 11.8 1.23 0.2891
  Site (site type) 11, 11 1.38 0.3019 11, 11 1.33 0.3238
  Season* site (site type) 1, 13.1 0.92 0.3432 1, 11.8 1.23 0.2891
 St. Petersburg
  Site type 1, 5.9 0.15 0.7147 1, 5.9 0.51 0.5012
  Site (site type) 6, 29 4.47 0.0025* 6, 26 4.31 0.0032*
 Bradenton
  Site type 1, 5.0 0.92 0.3806 1, 5.0 0.17 0.7003
  Site (site type) 5, 27 2.54 0.0521* 5, 27 3.29 0.0190*
Black ovitraps in Tampa
  Land use 2, 69.3 12.64 <0.0001* 2, 64.4 1.96 0.1495
  Site (land use) 54, 75 1.51 0.0499* 54, 75 2.22 0.0007*

A total of 48 black ovitraps were lost (26.7%) during the Tampa-wide study in September, including all three traps at four grid cells, giving a total of 56 replicated sample areas

*

Significant effect