Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 10;32(10):1930–1937. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0619

Table 2.

Primary pooled analyses of the effect of fructose exchange for carbohydrate on blood lipids

Outcome No. (studies) No. (subjects) Effect estimate
Heterogeneity
SMD (95% CI) P χ2 I2 (%) P
TG
    Any diabetes 16 236 0.01 (−0.19–0.21) 0.9 36.75 59 0.001
    Type 1 diabetes 4 54 −0.03 (−0.51–0.46) 0.91 10.96 73 0.01*
    Type 2 diabetes 11 156 0.06 (−0.17–0.30) 0.61 23.22 57 0.01
Total cholesterol
    Any diabetes 14 172 −0.02 (−0.18–0.14) 0.79 40.96 71 <0.0001
    Type 1 diabetes 2 14 0.17 (−0.32–0.67) 0.49 5.45 82 0.02
    Type 2 diabetes 11 132 −0.08 (−0.26–0.10) 0.37 32.29 72 0.0002
LDL cholesterol
    Any diabetes 7 99 0.02 (−0.07–0.11) 0.69 7.00 14 0.32
    Type 1 diabetes 1 6 0.25 (−0.03–0.53) 0.08
    Type 2 diabetes 6 93 −0.01 (−0.10–0.09) 0.86 3.97 0 0.55
HDL cholesterol
    Any diabetes 12 164 0.02 (−0.05–0.10) 0.51 48.01 77 <0.00001
    Type 1 diabetes 1 6 −0.01 (−0.46–0.44) 0.96
    Type 2 diabetes 10 132 0.02 (−0.05–0.10) 0.53 47.95 81 <0.00001

Analyses were performed by the generic inverse variance method using fixed-effects or random-effects (if heterogeneity was significant at P < 0.10) models with paired analyses applied for crossover trials (12). —, no available data for subgroup analyses or, if there are no data for heterogeneity in the presence of a corresponding effect estimate, data only available from one study, precluding calculation of I2 and the corresponding P value.

*Removal of Osei et al. (20) during sensitivity analyses explained heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.59).

†Removal of Osei and Bossetti (24) during sensitivity analyses explained heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.88 for all diabetes; I2 = 0%, P = 0.76 for type 2 diabetes).

‡Removal of Pelkonen et al. (16) during sensitivity analyses explained heterogeneity (I2 = 10%, P = 0.33).