Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 10;32(10):1916–1920. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0412

Table 2.

Comparison of lipid profile based on hypertriglyceridemic phenotype

Group Triglycerides (mg/dl) LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) TRL cholesterol (mg/dl) Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) ApoB (mg/dl)
1 (n = 18) 114 ± 381 109 ± 156 61 ± 58 19 ± 17 129 ± 34 80 ± 30
2 (n = 230) 117 ± 111 110 ± 45 51 ± 17* 19 ± 17 130 ± 30 80 ± 30
3 (n = 127) 270 ± 185 119 ± 75 42 ± 23 40 ± 23 159 ± 45 100 ± 30

Data are means ± SD. Group 1 (low waist circumference and low triglyceride; waist circumference ≤90 cm in men or ≤85 cm in women and triglycerides <177 mg/dl); group 2 (high waist circumference and low triglyceride; waist circumference >90 cm in men or >85 cm in women and triglycerides <177 mg/dl, n = 230); and group 3 (high waist circumference and high triglyceride; waist circumference >90 cm in men or >85 cm in women and triglycerides ≥177 mg/dl, n = 127). Analysis is adjusted for age, BMI, sex, diabetes treatment, years of smoking, insulin use, duration of diabetes, and use of statins. TRL cholesterol was calculated by subtracting the directly measured values for LDL and HDL cholesterol from total cholesterol. Non-HDL cholesterol was calculated by subtracting the directly measured values for HDL cholesterol from total cholesterol.

*P < 0.01 vs. group 1;

P < 0.0001 vs. groups 1 and 2;

P < 0.01 vs. groups 1 and 2.