Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genomics. 2008 Oct 23;93(1):83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.09.006

Table 2.

Motifs detected in the region between − 100 nt and + 40 nt based on both McPromoter-predicted TSS and database-annotated TSS for the retrogenes and parental genes with annotated 5′ UTRs.

Motif Name Motif name (Fitzgerald et al. 2006) Motif number (Ohler et al. 2002) Consensus sequence Retrogenes (n = 65) Parental Genes (n = 83)

ND (47) D (18)
ND (17) D (66)
TSS a TSS b
TATA DMp1 3 TATAWAA 8 2 2 2 8
INR DMp2 4 TCAKTY 16 2 1 3 17
INR1 DMp3 - TCATTCG 1 1 1 1 0
MTE - 10 CSSAACGS 2 0 0 0 3
DRE NDM4 2 WATCGATW 5 9 8 6 20
- DMv2 8 TGGYAACR 0 1 1 0 3
- DMv3 7 CAYCNCTA 2 2 2 1 13
- DMv4 1 GGYCACAC 2 4 2 4 20
- DMv5 6 GTATWTTT 3 0 0 0 8
E-box NDM5 5 CAGCTSW 1 5 5 1 7
DPE DMp4 9 KCGGTTS 0 0 0 0 2
GCT - - YGGCTTTK 7 0 0 1 1

Total numbers of genes are given in parentheses. D refers to a TSS detected by McPromoter. ND means that the TSS was not detected by McPromoter. The high abundance of some motifs is highlighted in bold.

a

TSS is based on the database.

b

TSS is based on McPromoter prediction.