Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Nov;108(11):1921–1926. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.08.003

Table 2.

Distribution of the sample, and the mean and standard deviation of the number of piles, across demographic categories

Characteristic n % Mean±standard
deviation
Total 149 100 8.3±3.8
Sex
 Male 64 43.0 7.7±3.9
 Female 85 57.0 8.7±3.7
Age (y)
 8 23 15.4 9.2±4.6
 9 24 16.1 9.2±4.3
 10 33 22.1 7.6±3.2
 11 26 17.4 8.0±4.1
 12 16 10.7 9.1 ±3.7
 13 27 18.1 7.3±3.0
Language spoken
 English 133 89.3 8.2±4.0
 Spanish 16 10.7 9.1±2.4
Race/ethnicity
 White 47 31.5 7.8±3.2
 African American 36 24.2 7.8±4.4
 Hispanic 64 43.0 9.0±3.8
 Othera 2 1.3 6.0±5.7
Obesity index
 Normal (BMIb%<85%) 84 56.4 8.5±3.8
 At risk (85%<BMI%<95%) 28 18.8 8.5±4.5
 Overweight (BMI%≥95%) 36 24.2 7.6±3.4
 Missinga 1 0.7 5.0±NAc
Annual household incomed
 <$20,000 22 14.8 11.2±4.6
 $20,000–$59,000 31 20.8 8.1 ±2.9
 >$60,000 77 51.7 8.2±3.7
 Missinga 19 12.8 5.5±2.5
Highest household educatione
 High school graduate or less 33 22.1 10.3±4.2
 Some college/technical school 22 14.8 7.6±3.8
 College graduate 78 52.3 8.2±3.4
 Missinga 16 10.7 5.4±2.6
a

Missing category and "other" race/ethnicity not included in testing differences among number of piles.

b

BMI=body mass index.

c

NA=not applicable.

d

Significant effect [F(2,127)=6.37, P=0.002] for household income, post hoc revealed significant (P<0.0167) difference between <$20,000 and both higher income categories.

e

Significant effect for highest household education [F(2,132)=4.57, P=0.012]; however, post hoc tests yielded no significant (P<0.0167) pairwise comparisons.