Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2009 Jun 10;42(12):1903–1908. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.009

Table 1.

Comparisons of experimental setup and analysis between gait-slip and sit-to-stand-slip tasks

Gait-slip Sit-to-stand-slip
Tasks
After ~10 walking trials, the 1st unannounced slip
After ~4 regular trials, the 1st unannounced slip
Release mechanisms
Pre-released movable platform prior to foot contact
Both movable platforms were released at seat-off
Maximum allowed slip distance
1.50 m
0.24 m
Slip outcome classification criterion
Fall Peak harness force ≥ 30% bw Peak harness force ≥ 30% bw
Recovery Average harness force < 4.5% bw over any 1-second period Average harness force < 4.5% bw over any 1-second period
Harness-affected
None of above
None of above
Slip outcome (total n = 67 for gait; and n = 60 for sit-to-stand) Single-step fall 9 or [9/(9+4+44)=16%] 9 or [9/(9+3+32)=20%]
Multi-step fall 4 or [4/(9+4+44)=7%] 3 or [3/(9+3+32)=7%]
Recovery 44 or [44/(9+4+44)=77%] 32 or [3/(9+3+32)=73%]
Harness-affected 5 6
Excluded* 5 10

body weight

*

the exclusive criteria include missing data or trigging problem..