Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jul 29;205(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.024

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Motor performance and physical attributes of NPSR WT and KO mice. (A) Mean latencies of NPSR WT and KO mice to fall off an accelerating rotarod from individual trials during the three-day training period, * p < 0.05 after Bonferroni's post-hoc comparison. (B) Mean daily rotarod latencies on each training day, ** p < 0.01, Bonferroni's post-hoc test. (C) Forelimb grip strength in NPSR KO and WT mice does not differ. (D and E) Both genotypes display no difference in body weight or body length between 2 – 6 weeks of age. Animal numbers in A and B: NPSR WT n = 10; NPSR KO n = 13. Animal numbers in C: NPSR WT n = 8; NPSR KO n = 11. Animal numbers in D and E: NPSR WT n = 14; NPSR KO n = 26.