Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;162(6):1090–1099. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1090

TABLE 2.

Comparison of Photoelectric Cell and Electro-myographic (EMG) Methods for Recording Eye Blinks Following Startling Auditory Pulses Presented Alone and After Prepulses to Seven Healthy Adultsa

Photoelectric Cell
EMG
Mean
Difference
Variable Mean SD Mean SD
Millivolt level at
 start of trialb
 Pulse trials 136.38 70.45 8.43 2.58 0.002c
 Prepulse trials 147.74 104.09 7.81 4.21 0.001c
Maximum
 amplitude of
 peak (mV)b
 Pulse trials 2222.61 1462.06 106.02 58.04 7.48c
 Prepulse trials 907.47 591.63 42.78 23.94 1.83c
Time of peak
 (msec)
 Pulse trials 94.08 12.54 95.55 13.41 1.47
 Prepulse trials 72.55 22.53 84.45 9.06 11.90
Percentage
 prepulse
 inhibitiond
59.89 11.53 59.23 9.38 0.66
a

Differences were examined with paired t tests; none was significant at p≤0.10.

b

Raw values were transformed to t scores to resolve method scaling differences (mean=50, SD=10).

c

Difference in t score.

d

Calculated as 100 − ([peak in prepulse trials/peak in pulse trials] × 100).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure