Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;127(2):132–140. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.565

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics by Treatment Group

1 Sitting
N= 84
4 Sittings
N= 71

Gender: Women - n (%) 40 (48%) 31 (44%)

Age (yrs) - Median (25th, 75th percentile) 56
(49, 64)
54
(45, 61)

Racen (%)
    White 54 (64%) 33 (46%)
    African-American 20 (24%) 20 (28%)
    Hispanic or Latino 9 (11%) 13 (18%)
    Asian 0 4 (6%)
    More than one race 1 (1%) 1 (1%)

Diabetes Type - n (%)
    Type 1 16 (19%) 18 (25%)
    Type 2 68 (81%) 53 (75%)

Duration of Diabetes (years)-
    Median (25th, 75th percentile) 18
(13, 24)
20
(13, 27)

HbA1c (%) -Median (25th, 75th percentile) 7.7
(6.8, 9.1)
8.2
(7.2, 10.6)

Prior treatment for DME in study eye - n (%)
    None 72 (86%) 63 (89%)
    Focal laser photocoagulation 12 (14%) 8 (11%)

E-ETDRS Visual Acuity
    Median (25th, 75th percentile) – letter score 85
(79, 88)
83
(77, 87)

Central Subfield Thickness
    Median (25th, 75th percentile) - Microns 207
(191, 222)
198
(182, 222)
    ≥ 250 – 299 Microns - n (%) 3 (4%) 1 (1%)

Retinal Volume
    Median (25th, 75th percentile) - mm3 6.9
(6.6, 7.4)
7.0
(6.5, 7.4)

1 Sitting
N=81
4 Sittings
N=66

Retinopathy Severity - n (%)
(ETDRS Severity Scale)*
    Mild NPDR (35) 5 (6%) 0
    Moderate NPDR (43) 7 (9%) 2 (3%)
    Moderately severe NPDR (47) 24 (30%) 25 (38%)
    Severe NPDR (53) 5 (6%) 5 (8%)
    Mild PDR (60, 61) 19 (23%) 10 (15%)
    Moderate PDR (65) 11 (14%) 10 (15%)
    High Risk PDR (71, 75) 9 (11%) 12 (18%)
    Cannot Grade (90) 1 (1%) 2 (3%)

HbA1c: Missing 7 in one-sitting group, 13 in four-sittings group

*

Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus Photographic Risk Factors for Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy: ETDRS report no. 12. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:823–833

Photo missing 3 in one-sitting group and 5 in four-sittings group.