Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: Carcinogenesis. 2003 Aug 1;24(10):1683–1690. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgg130

Table 2.

Effect of diet on body weight, haem intake, concentration in faeces and daily output A: Effect of haemin and haemoglobin; B: Effect of inhibitors in a high-haemin context, and, C: in a low-haemin context.

A Haem in diet No of Rats Final body weight Faecal output (dry weight) Haem intake Haem in faeces

Diets* μmol/g g/rat g/day μmol/day μmol/g
CD 0 22 197 ± 9 0.6 ± 0.1 0 0.04 ± 0.09
LH 0.25 10 192 ± 8 0.5 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.1a 0.95 ± 0.24
MH 0.5 10 187 ± 8 a′ 0.5 ± 0.1 5.5 ± 0.3 a 2.1 ± 0.7 a
HH 1.5 20 178 ± 9 a 0.8 ± 0.1a 15.2 ± 2.2 a 6.6 ± 1.3 a
HG 1.5 10 193 ± 9 0.6 ± 0.1 16.8 ± 2.0 a 9.6 ± 0.9 a
TG 3.0 10 190 ± 10 0.6 ± 0.2 31.8 ± 3.2 a 14.7 ± 2.3 a

B

HH 1.5 20 178 ± 9 0.8 ± 0.1 15.2 ± 2.2 6.6 ± 1.3
HHCA 1.5 6 183 ± 5 0.8 ± 0.2 17.8 ± 1.4b 7.9 ± 0.6
HHAO 1.5 10 186 ± 9 0.6 ± 0.1 b 14.8 ± 1.3 9.5 ± 1.5 b
HHOO 1.5 8 180 ± 7 0.6 ± 0. 1 b 16.5 ± 0.8 12.3 ± 1.6 b

C

CD 0 22 197 ± 9 0.6 ± 0.1 0 0.04 ± 0.09
CDCA 0 8 193 ± 5 1.0 ± 0.1 a 0 0.01 ± 0.02
CDOO 0 8 188 ± 9 0.6 ± 0.1 0 0.04 ± 0.07
*

Dietary groups, see note to table 1.

a, a′

significantly different from control diet CD (a: p<0.01, a′: p<0.05 by Dunnett’s test)

b

significantly different from high-haemin diet HH (p<0.01, by Dunnett’s test)

c

haem metabolized was extrapolated by subtracting haem output from haem intake