Table 2. Comparison of ΔG0’ from literature and ΔG0ec calculated from metabolite concentrations.
from concentrations | Literature | Overlap | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
From | To | min ΔG0ec(kJ/mol) | max ΔG0ec(kJ/mol) | min ΔG0’(kJ/mol) | max ΔG0’(kJ/mol) | Min | Max |
F6P + ATP | FBP + ADP | N/Aa | 9.3 | −22.1 | −14.2 | −22.1 | −14.2 |
FBP | F6P + Pi | N/Aa | −2.2 | −14.1 | −10.0 | −14.1 | −10.0 |
FBP | DHAPb | 21.5 | 29.3 | 10.3 | 23.1 | 21.5 | 23.1 |
DHAP + NAD + ADP + Pi | 3PG + NADH +ATP | −22.9c | −40.1c | −12.6 | −0.30 | - | - |
3PG | PEP | −2.32 | 4.3 | −1.0 | 8.0 | −1 | 4.3 |
N/A: There is no lower bound on ΔG0ec using concentrations, as the reactions only need to work in one direction.
kJ/mole for FBP and kJ/(2 mole) for DHAP
A possible explanation for the requirement for a large negative ΔG0ec value for this reaction is mismeasurement of one or more reactants or products. A particular possibility is that 1,3-diphosphoglycerate is hydrolyzed to 3PG during metabolome extraction, leading to erroneously high measured 3PG concentration.