Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2005 Mar;5(1):14–20. doi: 10.3758/cabn.5.1.14

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Magnitude of the priming effect (identification time for unstudied words minus identification time for studied words) in Experiment 2 for controls (CON, n = 8), patients with large medial temporal lobe lesions (MTL, n = 2), and patients with damage limited to the hippocampal region (H, n = 3). (B) Magnitude of the fluency effect in Experiment 2 (identification time for words labeled new minus identification time for words labeled old). (C) Percentage of correct responses (hits plus correct rejections) on a test of recognition memory. Circles show individual scores for the patients. Dashed line indicates chance performance. Bracket shows standard errors of the means.