Skip to main content
. 2009 May 22;206(4):699–714. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1570-z

Table 4.

Effects of asenapine and olanzapine on 5-CSR task performance under standard or difficult conditions

Correct (%) Omissions,% Total trials CR latency (ms) IR latency (ms) CP latency (ms)
Standard paradigm
Asenapine (mg/kg s.c.)
 Vehicle 88.3 ± 1.7 8.3 ± 1.5 264 ± 8 527 ± 31 1,099 ± 74 1,655 ± 172
 0.003 88.5 ± 1.9 8.7 ± 1.5 264 ± 8 532 ± 40 1,132 ± 101 1,619 ± 135
 0.01 88.2 ± 1.6 9.3 ± 2.0 268 ± 8 522 ± 25 1,125 ± 56 1,635 ± 133
 0.03 87.9 ± 1.4 10.4 ± 1.9 262 ± 7 532 ± 30 1,066 ± 108 1,644 ± 119
NS NS NS NS NS NS
Olanzapine (mg/kg s.c.)
 Vehicle 86.0 ± 1.5 7.8 ± 0.9 261 ± 9 510 ± 20 1,130 ± 90 1,410 ± 100
 0.03 84.1 ± 1.7 6.4 ± 1.1 263 ± 6 510 ± 20 970 ± 80 1,480 ± 110
 0.1 86.9 ± 1.8 8.5 ± 0.8 261 ± 9 510 ± 20 1,230 ± 150 1,550 ± 120
 0.3 86.9 ± 1.3 15.8 ± 2.1**** 246 ± 10** 520 ± 20 1,510 ± 240**** 1,550 ± 80
NS F(3,133) = 18.83,  P < 0.0001 F(3,133) = 3.40,  P = 0.02 NS F(3,133) = 958,  P < 0.0001 NS
Difficult paradigm
Asenapine (mg/kg s.c.)
 Vehicle 71.0 ± 1.7 13.9 ± 3.6 240 ± 8 480 ± 18 929 ± 57 1,539 ± 109
 0.003 71.2 ± 2.6 12.3 ± 3.3 239 ± 8 477 ± 17 927 ± 47 1,508 ± 104
 0.01 72.1 ± 2.4 15.1 ± 4.4 242 ± 8 511 ± 26 1,016 ± 58 1,582 ± 104
 0.03 72.9 ± 1.3 19.2 ± 5.1*** 224 ± 12** 516 ± 33 1,080 ± 66* 1,558 ± 92
NS F(3,209) = 8.14,  P < 0.0001 F(3,209) = 6.62,  P < 0.0001 NS F(3,209) = 3.93,  P = 0.001 NS
Asenapine (mg/kg s.c.)
 Vehicle 73.6 ± 2.4 12.3 ± 4.4 231 ± 16 507 ± 26 1,019 ± 59 1,561 ± 118
 0.03 69.3 ± 2.6 12.9 ± 3.4 230 ± 10 519 ± 15 1,092 ± 52 1,587 ± 122
 0.1 65.0 ± 3.2**** 21.9 ± 3.5** 187 ± 13**** 529 ± 24 1,115 ± 71 1,594 ± 115
 0.3 66.3 ± 4.2 39.7 ± 5.9**** 97 ± 26**** 521 ± 33*** 1,446 ± 151**** 2,813 ± 1,064
F(3,209) = 6.45,  P < 0.0001 F(3,209) = 40.01,  P < 0.0001 F(3,209) = 62.69,  P < 0.0001 F(3,209) = 6.03,  P = 0.001 F(3,209) = 5.31,  P = 0.002 NS
Olanzapine (mg/kg s.c.)
 Vehicle 73.16 ± 1.7 8.9 ± 1.3 251 ± 6 481 ± 21 1,015 ± 97 1,466.3 ± 114
 0.03 68.44 ± 1.2** 10.9 ± 1.3 239 ± 7** 517 ± 36 977 ± 81 1,500.1 ± 121
 0.1 70.54 ± 2.2 13.7 ± 3.0** 237 ± 13*** 508 ± 35 987 ± 88 1,500.5 ± 117
 0.3 67.4 ± 2.2** 17.3 ± 4.4**** 216 ± 15**** 492 ± 25 1,117 ± 88 1,607.1 ± 179
F(3,189) = 3.77,  P = 0.012 F(3,189) = 11.05,  P < 0.0001 F(3,189) = 15.96,  P < 0.0001 NS NS F(3,189) = 3.04,  P = 0.03
Risperidone (mg/kg s.c.)
 Vehicle 71.1 ± 1.8 13.9 ± 3.6 241 ± 8 480 ± 18 929 ± 57 1,539 ± 109
 0.01 71.3 ± 2.6 12.3 ± 3.3 239 ± 8 477 ± 17 927 ± 47 1,508 ± 104
 0.03 72.1 ± 2.5 15.1 ± 4.4*** 242 ± 8* 511 ± 26 1,016 ± 58** 1,582 ± 104*
 0.1 73.0 ± 1.3 19.2 ± 5.1*** 224 ± 12**** 516 ± 33**** 1,080 ± 66**** 1,558 ± 92
F(3,269) = 7.68,  P < 0.0001 F(3,269) = 6.95,  P < 0.0001 F(3,269) = 6.15,  P < 0.0001 F(3,269) = 9.03,  P < 0.0001 F(3,269) = 2.93,  P = 0.034

Standard paradigm: stimulus duration of cue light = 0.25 s. Difficult paradigm: stimulus duration of cue light = 0.5 s. Data are mean ± SEM.

5-CSR 5-choice serial reaction, CP collect pellet, CR correct response, IR incorrect response, s.c. subcutaneous

“”*P < 0.05, **P 0.01, ***P 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 (Dunnett’s test vs vehicle)