Skip to main content
. 2009;17(3):e80–e89. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.80E

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of articles retrieved.

Level of Evidence (CEBM) Experimental Design Validity Score (PEDro Scale) Author(s)
lb RCT 6/10 Schillinger et al11
lb RCT 7/10 Harén et al12
2b Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial 6/10 Eisenhart et al2
4 Case study N/A Weiss4
4 Pilot study N/A Asplund13
4 Case study N/A Lancaster & Crow14
5 Animal model N/A Déry et al15
5 Animal model N/A Knott et al16
5 Animal model N/A Hodge et al17
  • Oxford Center of Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence9,10

  • 1a: Systematic reviews of RCTs 1b: Individual RCTs 1c: All-or-none studies

  • 2a: Systematic reviews of cohort studies

  • 2b: Individual cohort studies or low quality RCTs (< 80% follow-up)

  • 2c: Outcomes research

  • 3a: Systematic reviews of case-control studies 3b: Individual case-control studies

  • 4: Case series, poorly designed cohort or case-control studies

  • 5: Animal and bench research