Table 4.
RR (95% CI)b | ||
---|---|---|
Factor score | Malesc | Femalesd |
Factor 1: Social advantage | 1.00 (0.94, 1.06) | -- |
White | -- | 0.91 (0.84, 0.99) |
Black | -- | 1.05 (0.95, 1.17) |
Hispanic | -- | 0.80 (0.70, 0.92) |
Asian | -- | 0.93 (0.66, 1.31) |
Factor 2: Schooling | 0.96 (0.89, 1.03) | 0.91 (0.85, 0.98) |
Factor 3: Employment | 1.05 (0.97, 1.13) | 0.97 (0.92, 1.01) |
Factor 4: Economic hardship | 1.04 (0.98, 1.11) | -- |
White | -- | 1.07 (1.01, 1.14) |
Black | -- | 1.03 (0.97, 1.10) |
Hispanic | -- | 1.05 (0.96, 1.16) |
Asian | -- | 1.76 (1.31, 2.37) |
The final models for both males and females were adjusted for age and adolescent obesity.
RR= relative risk; CI=confidence interval
Models for males were pooled and adjusted by race/ethnicity
Significant interactions (p<0.05) between race/ethnicity and Factor 1 (p=0.013) and Factor 4 (p=0.017) were used to calculate racial/ethnic-stratified results in models for females