Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50(Suppl 1):122S–150S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307

TABLE 5.

Comparison of Qualitative PET Response Criteria and IWC + PET (17,33,84,141,146148)

Characteristic Hicks criteria IWC + PET (lymphoma)
Measurability of lesion at baseline 1. 18F-FDG–avid 1. 18F-FDG–avid tumor; baseline PET scan is desirable
2. Standardized display with normalization to liver 2. Variably 18F-FDG–avid tumor; 18F-FDG baseline PET scan is required
3. Follow-up PET at least 3 wk after last chemotherapy session or at least 8–12 wk after last radiation therapy session

Objective response Complete metabolic response: 18F-FDG–avid lesions revert to background of normal tissues in which they are located Complete response in 18F-FDG–avid tumors: no focal or diffuse increased 18F-FDG uptake over background in location consistent with tumor, regardless of CT abnormality; new lung nodules in lymphoma patient without history of lung involvement (regardless of 18F-FDG avidity) are not considered lymphoma; increased focal or multifocal marrow uptake is not considered tumor unless biopsy is done
Partial metabolic response: “significant reduction in SUV in tumors” Noncomplete response: diffuse or focal uptake exceeding mediastinal blood pool if >2 cm in size; in nodes < 2 cm diameter, uptake of 18F-FDG greater than background is positive; lesions > 1.5 cm in size in liver or spleen with uptake equal to or greater than spleen are considered tumor
SMD: “no visible change in metabolic activity of tumors” Partial remission: see Table 3
Progressive metabolic disease: “increase in intensity or extent of tumor metabolic activity or new sites” Progressive disease: see Table 3