Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Mar 1;103(481):61–73. doi: 10.1198/016214507000000329

Table 6.

Large-sample robustness of the assumed Gaussian random effects model (GRE) when the true dependence structure between tests is a finite mixture (FM) model

r η1 Estimator (misspecified model) Expected log-likelihood*


Pd
SENS* SPEC* EFM[log LFM] EFM[log LGRE]
0 .2 .41 .45 .92 −2.24106 −2.24106
.02 .22 .70 .90 −2.24359 −2.24319
.2 .20 .73 .90 −2.26357 −2.26241
1 .20 .75 .90 −2.34997 −2.34782
0 .5 .15 .77 .86 −2.10467 −2.10476
.02 .16 .74 .87 −2.10903 −2.10758
.20 .25 .57 .88 −2.13865 −2.13370
1 .26 .57 .89 −2.25944 −2.24983

NOTE: Verification is restricted to those patients who screen positive on at least one test, and r is the proportion of samples who are verified at random from those patients [i.e., P(Vi=1|j=1Jyij=s)=0 if s = 0 and r otherwise]. The true model is an FM model with η0 = .2, Pd = .2, SENS = .75 and SPEC = .9 for differing r and η1 and with J = 5.

*

Expected individual contribution to the log-likelihood.