Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Mar 1;103(481):61–73. doi: 10.1198/016214507000000329

Table 7.

Simulations with a common sensitivity and specificity

I r FM model average estimate GRE model average estimate % (log LFM ≫ log LGRE)*


Pd SENS SPEC Pd SENS SPEC
100 0 .20 (.05) .75 (.10) .90 (.03) .25 (.13) .64 (.18) .88 (.04) 2
.05 .20 (.05) .76 (.09) .90 (.02) .19 (.09) .74 (.13) .88 (.04) 7
.10 .20 (.05) .75 (.09) .90 (.02) .19 (.07) .75 (.11) .89 (.03) 10
.20 .20 (.04) .75 (.07) .90 (.02) .20 (.05) .75 (.08) .90 (.02) 12
.50 .20 (.04) .75 (.06) .90 (.02) .20 (.04) .75 (.06) .90 (.02) 16
1 .20 (.04) .75 (.05) .90 (.02) .20 (.04) .75 (.05) .90 (.02) 19
1,000 0 .19 (.02) .75 (.04) .90 (.01) .32 (.12) .57 (.16) .91 (.02) 12
.05 .19 (.02) .75 (.03) .90 (.01) .20 (.03) .73 (.05) .90 (.01) 45
.10 .20 (.02) .75 (.03) .90 (.01) .20 (.02) .74 (.03) .90 (.01) 55
.20 .20 (.01) .75 (.02) .90 (.01) .20 (.02) .74 (.03) .90 (.01) 64
.50 .20 (.01) .75 (.02) .90 (.01) .20 (.01) .75 (.02) .90 (.01) 75
1 .20 (.01) .75 (.02) .90 (.01) .20 (.01) .75 (.02) .90 (.01) 79

NOTE: Data were simulated under the finite mixture (FM) model with Pd = .2, η0 = η1 = .2, SENS = .75, SPEC = .90, and J = 5. Results are based on 1,000 simulations. Mean parameter estimate and standard errors are presented in ( ).

*

Proportion of realizations where the log-likelihood under the FM model is more than 1 larger than the log-likelihood under the misspecified GRE model.