Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Toxicol. 2009 Jun 21;83(10):909–924. doi: 10.1007/s00204-009-0450-y

Table 3.

Liver and serum levels of N-EtFOSE and its metabolites in female Sprague Dawley rats expressed as percentage of the total N-EtFOSE dose (%TD).a

N-EtFOSE metabolitesb %TD in Liver %TD in Serumc
N-EtFOSE -d 0.42 ± 0.20 (× 10-3) (n=5)
N-EtFOSAA 0.43 ± 0.13 0.38 ± 0.17
N-EtFOSA n.d. n.d.
FOSE 0.58 ± 0.35 (× 10-3) 0.07 ± 0.03 (× 10-3)
FOSA 0.29 ± 0.06 25.3 ± 6.1 (× 10-3)
PFOSe 6.23 ± 0.95 3.86 ± 0.86
Total 6.96 ± 0.92 3.69 ± 0.91
a

The total dose of N-EtFOSE for each animal was calculated as

TDNEtFOSE=N(5×b.w.day),

where 5 is the daily N-EtFOSE dose of 5.0 mg/kg body weight, b.w.day is the body weight on each day of N-EtFOSE administration and n is the number of days of N-EtFOSE administration (n = 3 × 5 days).

b

Adjusted for the respective matrix spike recovery in serum (N-EtFOSE = 67%; N-EtFOSAA = 159%; N-EtFOSA = 82%; FOSE = 96%; FOSA = 132%) and in the liver (N-EtFOSE = 2.5±1%; N-EtFOSAA = 156±3%; N-EtFOSA = 19±2%; FOSE = 57±2%; FOSA = 98±3%) if not stated otherwise. See the experimental part and Table 2 for additional details.

c

Calculated assuming a serum volume of 4.86 mL/100 mg for female Sprague-Dawley rats (Probst et al., 2006).

d %TD of N-EtFOSE in the liver is not reported because of the poor recovery rate (2.5±1%); also see Table 2.

e Adjusted for the recovery of 13C4-PFOS.